道徳性心理学の論争を紹介する。参考まで。概要と私のコメントは準備中
論争：Intuition
|
Target |
Haidt,J. The
emotional dog and its rational tail: A social
intuitionist approach to morality |
|
Comments |
Pizarro,D.A.,&Bloom,A. The intelligence of moral intuition: Comment on Haidt(2001)Psychological Review,2003、110,193-196 |
|
Comments |
Saltzstein,H.D.、＆Kasachkoff,T. Haidt's
moral intuitionist theory: A psychological and philosophical
critique Review of
General Psychology, 2004,8,273-282 |
|
Reply |
Haidt,J. The
emotional dog does learn new tricks: A reply to Pizarro and
Bloom(2003) |
The Moral Landscapeの著者Sam Hrarrisの道徳性における宗教、科学について
Edge論争はYou Tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSWRG6_bWPs で観られる。
21012AMEでKohlberg Lectureの演者J.Haditとの論争も面白い。
論争：コールバーグ（Kohlberg、L.）
|
Target |
Krebs,D.L.,&Denton,K.：Toward a
more pragmatic approach to morality: A critical
evaluation of Kohlberg’s Model.Psychological Review ,2005、112,679-649 |
|
Comments |
Gibbs,J：.Should
Kohlberg's Developmental Approach to Morality Be Replaced With a More
Pragmatic Approach? Psychological Review ,2006、113,666-671 |
|
Reply |
Krebs,D.L.,&Denton,K.：Explanatory
Limitations of Cognitive-Developmental Approaches to MoralityPsychological Review ,2006、113,672-675 |
Moral Psychology: 1-3巻発売 Neuroscience,CognitionとEvolutionである